Germany Must Reckon with its Past in Namibia
Between 1884 and 1917, Germany, which colonized Namibian territory, perpetrated an atrocity that would come to be known as the first genocide of the twentieth century. German General Lothar von Trotha ruthlessly exterminated the Herero and Nama tribes, who had rebelled against the inhumane practices of German rule. Between 1904 and 1908, nearly one hundred thousand indigenous people were slaughtered, regardless of gender, age, or innocence.
Parts of the Herero and Nama peoples were also subjected to
unimaginable medical experiments in concentration camps. Prisoners were worked
to death without rest in forced labor, systematically starved, and slowly
killed. By the end of the massacre, 80% of the Herero people and 50% of the
Nama tribe had been wiped out. This was, in the fullest sense of the word, a
genocide.
They Were Reduced to Skulls
Even the bodies of the murdered innocent indigenous people
were not left in peace. The skulls and bones of the corpses were collected and
shipped to Germany via the port of Cape Town, South Africa, for the purpose of
so-called "ethno-scientific studies." The grim task of cleaning and
preparing these skulls, which were to be sold to scientists, museums, and
universities, fell to Herero women, whom the German authorities treated as
prostitutes. The surviving Namibian natives were forced to endure further agony
by cleaning the skulls and bones of their own lost relatives.
Anatomist Eugen Fischer, who later worked for the Nazis,
traveled to German South-West Africa in 1908 to conduct research. There, he
collected more skulls and brought them back to Germany. His goal was to prove
the racial superiority of Europeans over Africans. Eugen Fischer would later
become the mentor of Josef Mengele, who conducted inhuman genetic experiments
on children in the Auschwitz concentration camp.
Germany Avoided Confronting the Genocide
Although the United Nations declared the events in Namibia a
genocide in 1985, Germany, like other European colonial powers, refused to
acknowledge this massacre for many years, barely even addressing it.
The traces of this brutality, which had been attempted to be
erased, were uncovered in a 2008 documentary by German journalist Markus
Frenzel, which sparked widespread public outcry in Germany. By 2010, efforts by
the Namibian ambassador to contact the anthropology departments of German
universities brought the issues of repatriating the skulls to Namibia and
providing material and moral reparations for the genocide to the fore.
Namibia sent delegates to Germany for talks. Twenty skulls
were handed over to the delegation, but the German administration not only
failed to receive them with appropriate protocol, but articles were also
published in the German press stating that Germany did not accept the events as
genocide.
The German government long resisted recognizing the genocide
it had perpetrated in Namibia and evaded paying its dues. Even when the German
government began negotiations with Namibia for a potential apology in 2015, the
talks were frequently stalled over disputes regarding reparations.
On May 28, 2021, after five years of negotiations, the
German government officially announced that it recognized the atrocities in
Namibia as a genocide.
The German administration agreed to provide €1.1 billion in
aid to the affected communities as "a gesture of recognition of the
immeasurable suffering." However, this was not termed "genocide
reparations" but rather "development aid."
Consequently, this sum, which arrived after an exceedingly
long time and was not even framed as reparations, was deemed insufficient by
the Namibian people.
Laidlaw Peringanda, chairman of the Namibian Genocide
Association, insisted that Germany must buy back land from the descendants of
German settlers and return it to the Herero and Nama people. The negotiations
were criticized because they were conducted solely between the German and
Namibian governments, excluding representatives of the Herero and Nama peoples,
and because they used terms like "reconciliation" and
"reconstruction" instead of "genocide reparations."
It Wanted to Send its own Refugees to Africa
Far from paying reparations for its past in Africa, the
German government is still preoccupied with using African countries for its own
benefit. A clear example of this is its desire from last year to send migrants
who had applied for asylum in Germany to Africa while their applications were
being processed—a process that could take years.
Germany intended to negotiate with Kenya, Ghana, Senegal,
Morocco, and other African countries, asking them to host these migrants
throughout the lengthy legal procedures. However, the plan, which caused major
controversy across the country, was not implemented.
Much like the UK's choice of Rwanda, another African nation,
to handle its migrant issue, Germany's turn to African countries to offload
refugees reveals the deeply distorted perspective European states still hold
towards Africa.
Genocidal Germany Sides with Genocidal Israel
While the world witnesses one of the worst genocides in
recent years, neither Muslim countries nor global powers have taken concrete
steps regarding the genocide in Gaza. The most significant response to the
genocide committed by Israel with American support came from the African
continent, often disparaged by Western media with negative labels like
"primitive," "backward," and "lawless." The
Republic of South Africa brought Israel's genocide and war crimes before the
International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Germany remained true to its genocidal past and, on January
12, announced it would intervene as a third party in the ICJ proceedings in
support of Israel. The German government rejected South Africa's accusations
against Israel "in determined and clear terms" and accused South
Africa of "instrumentalizing the Genocide Convention in a manner that is
procedurally unfounded and factually untenable."
The Namibian government, which declared its support for
South Africa, reminded Germany of its own genocidal history and called on it to
reconsider its decision to side with Israel in the Gaza genocide.
The positive progression of South Africa's genocide case
against Israel in favor of the Palestinian people (although an immediate
ceasefire has not been achieved and attacks continue, the Palestinian authority
welcomed the initiation of the legal process) is actually instructive for
Namibia as well. The outcome of this case will set a precedent for many
countries across the African continent that have suffered genocide, notably
Namibia, and will force colonial European states to legally confront the massacres
they committed in the past.
Sources:
https://www.farsnews.ir/en/news/14020820000796/Repr-Germany-Wans-Send-Asylm-Seekers-Africa
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt21h4xwg.14?seq=11
This article was originially published in Independent Türkçe, on February 1, 2024.
Comments
Post a Comment